My Ex Won’t Consent to My Child’s Passport: What Are My Options?

Your ex won’t sign your child’s passport application. What now? We explain the two pathways: applying directly to the Australian Passport Office under special circumstances or asking the Family Court for passport and travel orders.

Katrene Halteh, Urban Law Group

If your former partner refuses to consent to your child obtaining an Australian passport, that does not necessarily mean the passport cannot be issued.

Where there are no parenting orders in place, there are generally two pathways:

  1. apply directly to the Australian Passport Office and ask for the passport to be issued under the “special circumstances” provisions; or
  2. apply to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia for an order allowing the child to obtain a passport and, if necessary, travel overseas.

The right option depends on why consent is being withheld, whether the other parent actively objects, whether there are safety concerns, and whether overseas travel is planned.

Why is the other parent's consent usually required?

For a child passport application, the usual position is that each person with parental responsibility must consent.

The Australian Passport Office describes this as “full parental consent”. Where full consent is not available, a passport may still be issued in certain circumstances, including where there is an appropriate Australian court order or where the Passport Office accepts that special circumstances exist.

The fact that a child lives primarily with one parent does not automatically mean that parent can apply for the passport alone.

If the other parent will not sign, the issue is therefore usually which of the two alternative pathways is appropriate.

Pathway 1: Apply directly to the Australian Passport Office

The first option is to lodge the child's passport application without the other parent's consent and ask the Australian Passport Office to assess it under the “special circumstances” provisions.

This can be a useful option where the other parent cannot be contacted, has had little or no involvement with the child, or there are circumstances that make obtaining consent impractical or unsafe.

The Passport Office confirms that where there is no full parental consent and no relevant Australian court order, an applicant can request assessment under special circumstances.

What do you need to lodge?

In addition to the normal child passport application, you will generally need to complete Form B9, “Child without full consent or Australian court order permitting issue of a travel document”.

The Passport Office may also require other documents depending on the circumstances, including copies or originals of relevant court orders and Form B7 where applicable.

The Form B9 itself asks detailed questions about the other parent, attempts to contact them, the relationship between that parent and the child, child support and any existing or pending court proceedings.

What will the Passport Office consider?

The Passport Office looks at the particular circumstances of the application.

Depending on the case, relevant matters can include:

  • whether you have tried to obtain the other parent's consent;
  • whether those attempts were unsuccessful;
  • whether the other parent can be located;
  • the nature and frequency of contact between the other parent and the child;
  • whether there has been a substantial period of no contact;
  • whether there is family violence;
  • whether contacting the other parent would be unsafe or inappropriate;
  • any child welfare arrangements;
  • relevant medical or compassionate circumstances; and
  • whether there are current court proceedings affecting parental responsibility or international travel.

The Passport Office may ask for supporting material such as:

  • family violence orders;
  • police documents;
  • medical records;
  • correspondence from government bodies or schools;
  • foreign court orders;
  • evidence showing attempts to obtain consent; or
  • other documents explaining the child's circumstances.

Will the Passport Office contact the other parent?

It may.

Where appropriate, the Passport Office can seek further information concerning the application.

If contacting the other parent would create a safety risk, that should be explained clearly in the application and supported by evidence where available.

This can be particularly important in cases involving family violence or coercive control.

Is the Passport Office required to issue the passport?

No.

A special circumstances application is discretionary.

The Passport Office expressly states that there is no guarantee a passport will be issued where full parental consent is absent. These applications can also take longer than ordinary child passport applications, and faster processing options are not available.

The Passport Office also recommends not booking travel until the passport has actually been approved.

This is an important distinction.

The administrative pathway may be available, but it does not give the same certainty as an appropriate court order.

When is the Passport Office pathway most useful?

It may be worth considering where:

  • the other parent cannot be located;
  • the other parent has had no meaningful contact with the child for a significant period;
  • there is strong documentary evidence supporting the application;
  • contacting the other parent would be unsafe;
  • there are no current parenting proceedings;
  • overseas travel is not imminent; and
  • there is no substantial dispute about whether the child should travel internationally.

The Passport Office pathway can sometimes avoid the need for court proceedings altogether.

However, where the other parent is actively objecting or there is a genuine dispute about overseas travel, the Court pathway may be more appropriate.

Pathway 2: Apply to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia

The second pathway is to apply to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia for an order permitting the child to obtain a passport.

The Court specifically recognises applications where a person with parental responsibility “cannot or will not” sign a child's passport application.

The Court can make orders dealing with passports and international travel, including orders permitting a child to have an Australian passport or travel internationally.

An appropriate Australian court order can then be provided to the Passport Office instead of obtaining the other parent's consent.

What orders can you ask the Court to make?

Depending on the circumstances, orders may provide that:

  • the child is permitted to be issued with an Australian passport;
  • one parent is authorised to apply for and renew the child's passport without the other parent's consent or signature;
  • that parent may sign the necessary passport documents;
  • the child may travel internationally;
  • the child may travel to specified countries during specified dates;
  • travel information must be provided to the other parent; and
  • the passport is to be held by a particular person when the child is not travelling.

Where travel is actually proposed, it is often important to address both the passport and the international travel itself.

An order allowing a passport to be issued does not necessarily resolve every dispute about whether the child can travel overseas.

What if there are no current parenting proceedings?

If there are no existing proceedings, the Court states that an application concerning international travel is commenced by filing an Initiating Application (Family Law).

If proceedings are already underway, the orders may instead be sought by an Application in a Proceeding or by amending the existing application.

The Court also has a specific Practice Direction for passport proceedings where the application relates solely to a passport.

What will the Court consider?

The child's best interests remain the central consideration.

Where an application involves international travel, the Court may consider matters such as:

  • where the child is proposed to travel;
  • the dates and duration of the trip;
  • the purpose of the travel;
  • the proposed itinerary and accommodation;
  • the child's age and circumstances;
  • whether the trip will interfere with schooling or time with the other parent;
  • the child's relationship with both parents;
  • the applicant's connections to Australia;
  • citizenship and immigration status;
  • whether there have been threats that the child will not be returned;
  • whether the destination country is a party to the Hague Convention on international child abduction;
  • any relevant travel warnings;
  • previous compliance with parenting orders;
  • family violence or coercive control;
  • any risk that the child will not return to Australia; and
  • whether safeguards can address any genuine concerns.

The Court's international travel guidance specifically identifies matters including itinerary details, connections with Australia and the overseas country, Hague Convention status, immigration status, undertakings and security as potentially relevant.

What if the other parent says the child might not come back?

This is often one of the most significant issues in contested travel applications.

The Court may examine:

  • the travelling parent's employment and family ties to Australia;
  • property or other assets in Australia;
  • connections with the destination country;
  • the child's citizenship or eligibility for another passport;
  • previous statements or threats about remaining overseas;
  • previous compliance with parenting arrangements;
  • whether return flights have been booked;
  • the destination country's participation in the Hague Convention; and
  • whether undertakings, security or other conditions could reduce the risk.

A parent's objection will not automatically prevent the passport being issued or travel occurring.

Equally, an objection based on a genuine non-return concern will be treated differently from a bare refusal with no apparent connection to the child's welfare.

What if there has been family violence?

Family violence can be relevant to either pathway.

For the Passport Office pathway, it may explain why you have not approached the other parent for consent or why direct contact would be unsafe. The Passport Office expressly accepts family violence material as potentially relevant supporting evidence.

For a Court application, family violence may also be relevant to:

  • why consent could not safely be sought;
  • whether the ordinary pre-action process is appropriate;
  • whether the application is urgent;
  • the child's safety;
  • the travelling parent's safety;
  • the reasons for the other parent's refusal; and
  • whether additional safeguards are required.

The evidence should identify the actual conduct relied upon and, where available, be supported by contemporaneous material such as police records, protection orders or communications.

What if travel is urgent?

An urgent Court application can be made where the circumstances justify it.

The Court has procedures for requesting an urgent listing and requires the applicant to explain the facts establishing the urgency.

However, leaving the issue until immediately before a booked holiday can create avoidable difficulties.

If you know the other parent is likely to refuse consent, it is better to deal with the passport issue well before the proposed travel date.

Which pathway should you use?

The two pathways serve different situations.

Applying directly to the Passport Office may be appropriate where:

  • the other parent cannot be located;
  • there has been little or no contact for a significant period;
  • contacting them would be unsafe;
  • you have strong supporting material;
  • no court proceedings are already underway; and
  • there is no substantial dispute about international travel.

Applying to Court may be more appropriate where:

  • the other parent is actively refusing consent;
  • the other parent objects to the proposed overseas travel;
  • there are allegations the child may not be returned;
  • parenting proceedings are already on foot;
  • the proposed travel is time-sensitive;
  • the Passport Office has declined the application;
  • family violence or coercive control creates broader issues requiring orders; or
  • you need a clear and enforceable determination.

The Court's own guidance reflects these two alternatives. Where full consent is not available, a parent can first seek special circumstances consideration from the Passport Office. If that is unsuccessful, an application can be made to the Court.

In practice, however, it is not always necessary or sensible to attempt the administrative pathway first.

Where there is already a genuine dispute requiring judicial determination, going directly to Court may be the more appropriate course.

What should you do before choosing a pathway?

Before applying, it is useful to identify:

  • whether you simply need the child to have a passport, or whether overseas travel is also proposed;
  • whether the other parent has actually refused consent or simply has not responded;
  • what attempts have been made to obtain consent;
  • whether it is safe to contact the other parent;
  • whether there are existing or pending parenting proceedings;
  • whether there are genuine concerns about non-return;
  • how soon travel is proposed; and
  • what documentary evidence is available.

That information will usually determine whether a special circumstances application to the Passport Office is realistic or whether Court orders should be sought.

The key point

If your former partner will not consent to your child obtaining a passport and there are no parenting orders in place, there are two main pathways.

You can ask the Australian Passport Office to issue the passport under the special circumstances provisions.

Alternatively, you can apply to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia for an order permitting the child to obtain a passport and, where required, travel internationally.

The Passport Office pathway is discretionary. A Court order provides a clearer determination where the matter is genuinely contested.

Urban Law Group advises parents about child passport applications, international travel and parenting orders where the other parent will not consent.

This article contains general information only and is not legal advice. The appropriate pathway depends on the circumstances of the child, the reasons consent has not been obtained and any proposed overseas travel.